Trump's Western Civilization Speech (Deus Vult!)

The most important one yet?



Transcript by Vox Day

2 mins beginning.
15 mins Polish history/flattery segment starts to get good
20 mins The threats of today...
25 mins If we don't forget who we are, we cannot be beaten
31 mins Do we have the will to survive?

Perspective

http://www.independent.ie/sport/soccer/god-has-you-in-his-arms-and-i-will-always-carry-you-in-my-heart-jermain-defoes-emotional-tribute-to-bradley-lowery-35910625.html

More Than A Refugee

#morethanarefugee

Final Thoughts on the Election, Platforms, and what the Alt Media is saying

The terrorism has not helped Theresa May's cause. I understand why people would say that...terror often leads the masses to vote for a right wing or authoritarian regime. Let me present the opposite case:

Firstly, she is the PM right now, so any suggestion that she isn't able to control the situation (this is how 100 IQ people think, as though the Leader could somehow stop the tide itself) reflects badly on her.

Secondly, in case you didn't notice, she is a woman (take note Hillary "let's nuke the Rooskies" Clinton). In times of war, the public is likely to favour a male/authoritative candidate, regardless of their political stance. Corbyn may be a hippie but he is still a man and can be surprisingly authoritative at times.

Speaking of the media, yes they have been out to get Corbyn ever since he was elected leader of his party, for much the same reasons as with Bernie Sanders in the USA. However, as I said recently, the media has actually been batting for Corbyn in the run up to voting day.

(This is typical British establishment behaviour, as they always want the election to be close - although there is an outside possibility that they know Corbyn is ahead and are preparing a retreat based on that, as happened with Brexit. I don't believe this but it is possible.)

PARTY ISSUES:

- Conservatives have the standard 'Anglo-American Establishment' foreign policy (supporting ISISrael and Saudi Arabia while complaining about Assad and Putin, the real villains in all this). Labour under Corbyn has potentially a much better foreign policy. As leftists usually do.

- Conservatives support austerity. I agree, basically. Labour say they oppose austerity, although in practice they haven't always kept to that.

- Conservatives want to reintroduce grammar schools. I support this. Labour want to abolish selective education entirely.

- Conservatives, after the terrorism, want to censor the internet further to crack down on 'extremists', meaning white people angry about islamic attacks. I despise this. Labour are against this.

- Labour defends Mao-sympathising antiwhite bigot Diane Abbott.

- Conservatives are the party of the homopedo elite.

- Both parties say they support the Brexit vote but will probably try to reverse it somehow.

- Neither party will do anything about immigration and Islam, but Labour are openly in favour of both.

- Both parties believe in having a Rothschild central bank, a fiat debt currency, corporate legal status and intellectual property.



I don't think Corbyn actually supports Brexit. What I would say is that his non-stance on the issue comes from the fact that his hardcore supporters in former industrial areas were also an important part of voting to Leave the EU. In other words, much of his base (which he needs as he is sort of an outsider) would have turned on him if he campaigned for Remain.

As to the poll numbers - generally polls skew left, perhaps because leftists write them, perhaps because right wing people are more likely to hide their beliefs when talking to a lefty poll hack; and left leaning cosmopolitan types are probably more likely to answer a poll anyway. The reason doesn't matter too much, polls generally have been unreliable.

To end, I'm not a centrist or in favour of apathy, but I just didn't see anyone to vote for or how it would help us in this election.

Perhaps it comes down to, who do you want to annoy more?

Corbyn would be funny. No one can deny this.

Meewawl fan takes on terrorist with bare hands

I suppose you could say that 'ooligans are the ISIS of England. lol.

"A defiant football fan who charged at the three terrorists and took them all on with his bare hands has been nicknamed the Lion of London Bridge for his bravery.

Roy Larner, 47, was drinking in a pub when the three terrorists burst in and he held them off so others could escape, getting fairly cut up in the process.

They chanted "Islam, Islam" and "This is for Allah".

In return, Mr Larner shouted: "I'm f---ing Millwall!!"

He was knifed eight times before the jihadis left the Black & Blue restaurant and bar.

“It was just me, trying to grab them with my bare hands and hold on. I was swinging.

“I got stabbed and sliced eight times. They got me in my head, chest and both hands. There was blood everywhere.

“They were saying, ‘Islam, Islam!’. I said again, ‘F*** you, I’m Millwall!’

“It was the worst thing I could have done as they carried on attacking me."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/06/06/fing-millwall-defiant-football-fan-shouted-terrorists-tried/

Does this make up for the 2004 FA cup semi-final? Mmmmhhh not sure.

Seriously though that man is a legend.

(no one likes them, they don't care)

London Far More Peaceful Than Kabul, Ignore The Haters

Sure, you might have seen there was a brief happening yesterday in The Greatest City In The World™. Part of being in a vibrant modern city.

But since you are all racist and only care about terrorism if white people die, you probably didn't notice that two misunderstood youths blew themselves up in Kabul on the same day.

At least seven people have been killed and more than 119 wounded in three separate explosions at a high-profile funeral in Kabul, the third attack in four days in the Afghan capital.

Of course, we can envy cities like Kabul for their incredibly vibrant culture. Perhaps someday London or Paris will enjoy the privilege of being so enriched.

We could achieve this by increasing the number of Afghans. (Can you believe this blatant racism? Bigoted Germans not giving free language classes to Human Beings based on the colour of their skin.)

At the moment, the melting pot that is London is merely simmering. If we increase the number of Afghans, perhaps one day soon we will see Kabul culture on display in our cities, which everyone agrees must happen.


PS I'd rather write about something other than terrorism and the Kalergi plan, but it's kind of impossible to avoid at the moment. Bilderberg happened this week and maybe Corbyn could win the GE, which I doubt (polls always magically skew left), but it would be funny at least in terms of foreign policy and his views on Israel.

The Truth About 'Refugees' - Paul Joseph Watson (+ Stealing Flowers From Manchester Memorial)

Good video to share with people who aren't ready to walk out of the politically correct prison just yet.



What PJW is struggling to avoid, is that yes it really is about genetics and human biodiversity. People with higher testosterone and lower IQ are more aggressive and violent (or less restrained, ie civilised, if you prefer).

And 'equality' neither exists, nor did it have anything to do with the success of the West in 1450-1950.

Diverse approaches to commemorating terrorism

Meanwhile, here is a cool clash of culture! One person's culture says that items left at a memorial should be respected, while another's says that when opportunity knocks, it would be rude not to answer! (the kafirs won't even cut your hand off here, weak!)

Who is right? The great thing about Diversity is, there is no right answer.

Solzhenitsyn's "Two Hundred Years Together" now completely translated into English

https://www.docdroid.net/OdYUy5a/200-years-together.pdf.html

Surprisingly moderate Guardian article from 2003:

Solzhenitsyn breaks last taboo of the revolution
Nobel laureate under fire for new book on the role of Jews in Soviet-era repression
 ...

 Yet others failed to see the need for Solzhenitsyn's pursuit of this particular subject at present. Vassili Berezhkov, a retired KGB colonel and historian of the secret services and the NKVD (the precursor of the KGB), said: "The question of ethnicity did not have any importance either in the revolution or the story of the NKVD. This was a social revolution and those who served in the NKVD and cheka were serving ideas of social change.

 "If Solzhenitsyn writes that there were many Jews in the NKVD, it will increase the passions of anti-semitism, which has deep roots in Russian history. I think it is better not to discuss such a question now."

...or, ever?

When The Bad Goys Are The Good Guys

This is a poster for Far Cry 5. Christian Badboys are back! About time.

(these are supposed to be the villains)

What happens when every outlet of entertainment is trying to jam a SJW agenda down the throats of a less than receptive audience?

Well, I guess #GamerGate happens.

This poster was pulled. Out of touch metropolitans didn't think this would look appealing versus present day reality?

Now to continue my tradition of reviewing years-old video games.

Not too long ago I played some of Homefront: The Revolution. For many reasons I found this game to be a major turn-off - some of which are purely technical - but I also struggled to buy into the storyline.

If you haven't played it, basically an alternate-history America is occupied by an oppressive, futuristic North Korean army (Red Dawn except they daren't say China), and you become part of a guerilla war to free Philadelphia from aforementioned occupiers so that Freedumb and burgers/cheesesteaks can be enjoyed by everyone.

This is where things start to break down. First, it's set in Philadelphia which means that your revolutionary movement is 50% black. Fine, that's not a problem. I mean, everyone wants to side with militant black cop killers right? OK, we'll let this slide.

Of course, your insurgency is also truly feminist - about half of all fighters on your side are women. And literally none of the North Koreans are. But that's OK, totally not a problem.

It's just that...when you add this mix of insufferable empowah'd women, angry blacks and generally trash tier revolutionaries, who (when not giving leftist-flavoured speeches about 'muh human rights') riot and smash property while killing cops, and they are faced down by ethnically homogenous forces of patriarchy and tidiness...well let's just say that the transgressions of the North Korean occupiers seem to become less significant. They may be a totally alien people to me, but I still identified more easily with them than the so called 'good guys'.

Maybe it's the graffiti that swung it. I dunno. Hate graffiti and tattoos.

And for the record, I have zero admiration for authoritarianism or militarised police, etc. I am in favour of civilisation though. Savagery and Babylonism are what I dislike, no matter who is responsible for them.

Anyway here's a video that cultural progressives should have a think about.

Manchester Attack Info #PrayForIslamophobia

Here's a thot experiment...if you did a poll of the female kaffirs at the concert in Manchester, how many would support #RefugeesWelcome? I'm guessing at least 90 percent. What would be the result now, after the multicultural experience? I'm guessing two thirds, minimum.

pic isn't accurate, jew would have fled to Israel because "ant eye semitic poysecution"

I'm thinking the only way to get through to the average person is to start calling them Islamophobic when they complain about terrorism.

"It's terrible what happened in Manchester, just awful #westandtogether"

"What are you, some kind of Islamophobe? You can't stop people from expressing their faith in public"

B-but...the shadow government want us to hate Muslims!

Here is the thing. If it's true that the deep state allows or encourages or even makes some of these things happen - and I absolutely believe that is the case, since governments always love terrorism - it could still be prevented by not having Islam in your country. This kind of thing is routine in Muslim countries. It really is part of their culture. Their faith and holy book demands it.

Aangirfan post
- "The purpose of Operation Gladio attacks, like the one in Manchester, is to get people scared so that they will vote for politicians who work for the Deep State."

I would suggest that Theresa is on course for a comfortable election win and the Conservatives don't need extra help. If anything, it's normal in British politics for the media to bat for the party who is losing heavily in this situation (Labour), in order to make the election closer. (Close elections are dramatic and encourage participation; are easy to rig, and make people feel like they actually have a say.)

Although you could say that Corbyn is an outsider, some of his traditional voters are switching sides this one time because of Brexit (on which Corbyn took no stance). I live in Brexit voting, hardcore Labour country and the usual hostility to 'Tories' is not there, except on the issue of austerity/welfare cuts. They will win comfortably and I don't believe it was ever in question enough to justify the narrative presented above. Corbyn is a weak leader personality wise, and people are shallow.

meanwhile: http://beyondthepale.info/2017/05/22/migrant-rapes-not-making-news/

Hopefully this evildoer will be brought to justice, and appropriate limbs amputated, insha'allah.

In other news, there is no UKIP candidate where I live, so I won't vote in the general election. Our insane election system means this is a certain Labour seat anyway, so my vote would count for nothing regardless. May as well write in Charles Martel.