Thursday, 8 June 2017

Final Thoughts on the Election, Platforms, and what the Alt Media is saying


The terrorism has not helped Theresa May's cause. I understand why people would say that...terror often leads the masses to vote for a right wing or authoritarian regime. Let me present the opposite case:

Firstly, she is the PM right now, so any suggestion that she isn't able to control the situation (this is how 100 IQ people think, as though the Leader could somehow stop the tide itself) reflects badly on her.


Secondly, in case you didn't notice, she is a woman (take note Hillary "let's nuke the Rooskies" Clinton). In times of war, the public is likely to favour a male/authoritative candidate, regardless of their political stance. Corbyn may be a hippie but he is still a man and can be surprisingly authoritative at times.

Speaking of the media, yes they have been out to get Corbyn ever since he was elected leader of his party, for much the same reasons as with Bernie Sanders in the USA. However, as I said recently, the media has actually been batting for Corbyn in the run up to voting day.

(This is typical British establishment behaviour, as they always want the election to be close - although there is an outside possibility that they know Corbyn is ahead and are preparing a retreat based on that, as happened with Brexit. I don't believe this but it is possible.)

PARTY ISSUES:

- Conservatives have the standard 'Anglo-American Establishment' foreign policy (supporting ISISrael and Saudi Arabia while complaining about Assad and Putin, the real villains in all this). Labour under Corbyn has potentially a much better foreign policy. As leftists usually do.

- Conservatives support austerity. I agree, basically. Labour say they oppose austerity, although in practice they haven't always kept to that.

- Conservatives want to reintroduce grammar schools. I support this. Labour want to abolish selective education entirely.

- Conservatives, after the terrorism, want to censor the internet further to crack down on 'extremists', meaning white people angry about islamic attacks. I despise this. Labour are against this.

- Labour defends Mao-sympathising antiwhite bigot Diane Abbott.

- Conservatives are the party of the homopedo elite.


- Both parties say they support the Brexit vote but will probably try to reverse it somehow.

- Neither party will do anything about immigration and Islam, but Labour are openly in favour of both.

- Both parties believe in having a Rothschild central bank, a fiat debt currency, corporate legal status and intellectual property.



I don't think Corbyn actually supports Brexit. What I would say is that his non-stance on the issue comes from the fact that his hardcore supporters in former industrial areas were also an important part of voting to Leave the EU. In other words, much of his base (which he needs as he is sort of an outsider) would have turned on him if he campaigned for Remain.

As to the poll numbers - generally polls skew left, perhaps because leftists write them, perhaps because right wing people are more likely to hide their beliefs when talking to a lefty poll hack; and left leaning cosmopolitan types are probably more likely to answer a poll anyway. The reason doesn't matter too much, polls generally have been unreliable.

To end, I'm not a centrist or in favour of apathy, but I just didn't see anyone to vote for or how it would help us in this election.

Perhaps it comes down to, who do you want to annoy more?




Corbyn would be funny. No one can deny this.

Wednesday, 7 June 2017

Meewawl fan takes on terrorist with bare hands

I suppose you could say that 'ooligans are the ISIS of England. lol.

"A defiant football fan who charged at the three terrorists and took them all on with his bare hands has been nicknamed the Lion of London Bridge for his bravery.

Roy Larner, 47, was drinking in a pub when the three terrorists burst in and he held them off so others could escape, getting fairly cut up in the process.

They chanted "Islam, Islam" and "This is for Allah".

In return, Mr Larner shouted: "I'm f---ing Millwall!!"

He was knifed eight times before the jihadis left the Black & Blue restaurant and bar.

“It was just me, trying to grab them with my bare hands and hold on. I was swinging.

“I got stabbed and sliced eight times. They got me in my head, chest and both hands. There was blood everywhere.

“They were saying, ‘Islam, Islam!’. I said again, ‘F*** you, I’m Millwall!’

“It was the worst thing I could have done as they carried on attacking me."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/06/06/fing-millwall-defiant-football-fan-shouted-terrorists-tried/

Does this make up for the 2004 FA cup semi-final? Mmmmhhh not sure.

Seriously though that man is a legend.

(no one likes them, they don't care)

Sunday, 4 June 2017

London Far More Peaceful Than Kabul, Ignore The Haters

Sure, you might have seen there was a brief happening yesterday in The Greatest City In The World™. Part of being in a vibrant modern city.


But since you are all racist and only care about terrorism if white people die, you probably didn't notice that two misunderstood youths blew themselves up in Kabul on the same day.
At least seven people have been killed and more than 119 wounded in three separate explosions at a high-profile funeral in Kabul, the third attack in four days in the Afghan capital.

Of course, we can envy cities like Kabul for their incredibly vibrant culture. Perhaps someday London or Paris will enjoy the privilege of being so enriched.

We could achieve this by increasing the number of Afghans. (Can you believe this blatant racism? Bigoted Germans not giving free language classes to Human Beings based on the colour of their skin.)

At the moment, the melting pot that is London is merely simmering. If we increase the number of Afghans, perhaps one day soon we will see Kabul culture on display in our cities, which everyone agrees must happen.


PS I'd rather write about something other than terrorism and the Kalergi plan, but it's kind of impossible to avoid at the moment. Bilderberg happened this week and maybe Corbyn could win the GE, which I doubt (polls always magically skew left), but it would be funny at least in terms of foreign policy and his views on Israel.

Thursday, 1 June 2017

The Truth About 'Refugees' - Paul Joseph Watson (+ Stealing Flowers From Manchester Memorial)

Good video to share with people who aren't ready to walk out of the politically correct prison just yet.



What PJW is struggling to avoid, is that yes it really is about genetics and human biodiversity. People with higher testosterone and lower IQ are more aggressive and violent (or less restrained, ie civilised, if you prefer).

And 'equality' neither exists, nor did it have anything to do with the success of the West in 1450-1950.



Diverse approaches to commemorating terrorism

Meanwhile, here is a cool clash of culture! One person's culture says that items left at a memorial should be respected, while another's says that when opportunity knocks, it would be rude not to answer! (the kafirs won't even cut your hand off here, weak!)

Who is right? The great thing about Diversity is, there is no right answer.

Sunday, 28 May 2017

Solzhenitsyn's "Two Hundred Years Together" now completely translated into English

https://www.docdroid.net/OdYUy5a/200-years-together.pdf.html


Surprisingly moderate Guardian article from 2003:

Solzhenitsyn breaks last taboo of the revolution
Nobel laureate under fire for new book on the role of Jews in Soviet-era repression
 ...
 Yet others failed to see the need for Solzhenitsyn's pursuit of this particular subject at present. Vassili Berezhkov, a retired KGB colonel and historian of the secret services and the NKVD (the precursor of the KGB), said: "The question of ethnicity did not have any importance either in the revolution or the story of the NKVD. This was a social revolution and those who served in the NKVD and cheka were serving ideas of social change.

 "If Solzhenitsyn writes that there were many Jews in the NKVD, it will increase the passions of anti-semitism, which has deep roots in Russian history. I think it is better not to discuss such a question now."

...or, ever?

Thursday, 25 May 2017

When The Bad Goys Are The Good Guys

This is a poster for Far Cry 5. Christian Badboys are back! About time.
(these are supposed to be the villains)
What happens when every outlet of entertainment is trying to jam a SJW agenda down the throats of a less than receptive audience?

Well, I guess #GamerGate happens.

This poster was pulled. Out of touch metropolitans didn't think this would look appealing versus present day reality?

Now to continue my tradition of reviewing years-old video games.

Not too long ago I played some of Homefront: The Revolution. For many reasons I found this game to be a major turn-off - some of which are purely technical - but I also struggled to buy into the storyline.

If you haven't played it, basically an alternate-history America is occupied by an oppressive, futuristic North Korean army (Red Dawn except they daren't say China), and you become part of a guerilla war to free Philadelphia from aforementioned occupiers so that Freedumb and burgers/cheesesteaks can be enjoyed by everyone.

This is where things start to break down. First, it's set in Philadelphia which means that your revolutionary movement is 50% black. Fine, that's not a problem. I mean, everyone wants to side with militant black cop killers right? OK, we'll let this slide.

Of course, your insurgency is also truly feminist - about half of all fighters on your side are women. And literally none of the North Koreans are. But that's OK, totally not a problem.

It's just that...when you add this mix of insufferable empowah'd women, angry blacks and generally trash tier revolutionaries, who (when not giving leftist-flavoured speeches about 'muh human rights') riot and smash property while killing cops, and they are faced down by ethnically homogenous forces of patriarchy and tidiness...well let's just say that the transgressions of the North Korean occupiers seem to become less significant. They may be a totally alien people to me, but I still identified more easily with them than the so called 'good guys'.

Maybe it's the graffiti that swung it. I dunno. Hate graffiti and tattoos.

And for the record, I have zero admiration for authoritarianism or militarised police, etc. I am in favour of civilisation though. Savagery and Babylonism are what I dislike, no matter who is responsible for them.

Anyway here's a video that cultural progressives should have a think about.

Wednesday, 24 May 2017

Manchester Attack Info #PrayForIslamophobia

Here's a thot experiment...if you did a poll of the female kaffirs at the concert in Manchester, how many would support #RefugeesWelcome? I'm guessing at least 90 percent. What would be the result now, after the multicultural experience? I'm guessing two thirds, minimum.

pic isn't accurate, jew would have fled to Israel because "ant eye semitic poysecution"
I'm thinking the only way to get through to the average person is to start calling them Islamophobic when they complain about terrorism.

"It's terrible what happened in Manchester, just awful #westandtogether"

"What are you, some kind of Islamophobe? You can't stop people from expressing their faith in public"


B-but...the shadow government want us to hate Muslims!

Here is the thing. If it's true that the deep state allows or encourages or even makes some of these things happen - and I absolutely believe that is the case, since governments always love terrorism - it could still be prevented by not having Islam in your country. This kind of thing is routine in Muslim countries. It really is part of their culture. Their faith and holy book demands it.

Aangirfan post
- "The purpose of Operation Gladio attacks, like the one in Manchester, is to get people scared so that they will vote for politicians who work for the Deep State."

I would suggest that Theresa is on course for a comfortable election win and the Conservatives don't need extra help. If anything, it's normal in British politics for the media to bat for the party who is losing heavily in this situation (Labour), in order to make the election closer. (Close elections are dramatic and encourage participation; are easy to rig, and make people feel like they actually have a say.)

Although you could say that Corbyn is an outsider, some of his traditional voters are switching sides this one time because of Brexit (on which Corbyn took no stance). I live in Brexit voting, hardcore Labour country and the usual hostility to 'Tories' is not there, except on the issue of austerity/welfare cuts. They will win comfortably and I don't believe it was ever in question enough to justify the narrative presented above. Corbyn is a weak leader personality wise, and people are shallow.

meanwhile: http://beyondthepale.info/2017/05/22/migrant-rapes-not-making-news/


Hopefully this evildoer will be brought to justice, and appropriate limbs amputated, insha'allah.

In other news, there is no UKIP candidate where I live, so I won't vote in the general election. Our insane election system means this is a certain Labour seat anyway, so my vote would count for nothing regardless. May as well write in Charles Martel.

Sunday, 7 May 2017

Fun with the Political Simulator - Restore the West scenario

How would you solve the problems of a western European country? Suppose, for whatever reason, some lunatic put you in charge of policy in Britain, France, Germany etc. Basically, you're Steve Bannon, or what Steve Bannon should have been if the deep state didn't more or less oust him.

http://filteries.com/politics

This is what I decided to pick, taking into account the situation. It isn't what I would call ideal, but it's intended to be a solution for the West's ills right now.

click

Thoughts:

There is no constitution. Scary.

Direct democracy is also terrifying. Who will represent us and tell us what we really mean?

Isolationist foreign policy. We're not ready to retake Constantinople yet.

The state religion of course is Christianity. It built Europe, it's not going away.


There is no legal death penalty for treason or war crimes, lol.

Immigration is extremely restricted and crucially, there is no path to full citizenship. China style.


Females everywhere rejoice inwardly as feminism is over.


Abortion and euthanasia are fully outlawed, no exceptions. They are disgraceful. Doctors should stick to the Hippocratic Oath.

Vices, while degenerate and hated by those who don't participate in them, are all legal as long as they are kept behind closed doors. Notice there is no 'decriminalisation'...I hate these kind of police shakedown rackets.

Absolutely unrestricted ownership of conventional military hardware. I wouldn't stop at rifles.

Taxpayers and teachers celebrate as education is fully privatised and the national curriculum is scrapped. Nighty night commie professors.

Agricultural funding ended, so we can stop the onslaught of subsidised wheat and other shitty grains destroying our wellbeing. Suck it Kellogg.


There is no central bank, ha! Austrian economics has been implemented as much as can reasonably be achieved within the bounds of human biodiversity and other limitations of reality.


No consumption or income taxes, yet the obligations of the state are funded by a combination of oil money, import tariffs, a corporate tax* and a (((capital gains))) tax. ;)

Welfare cut to a bare minimum, yet somehow we can still afford a reasonable subsidy for private healthcare, and a modest pension for our beloved seniors.

I don't think this is unrealistic, except for the notion that I would be in a position to make these decisions. And that the person trying to implement this program wouldn't be killed straight away and the assassin supported by about 51% of society. But I tried to make it a workable plan.

So yeah, put me in charge of a country, what could go wrong. I'm sure you could do better.

*I'm still raging - it didn't let me abolish corporate legal status and intellectual property.

Friday, 5 May 2017

Sargon: The Brexit Election



It is true that the media and establishment hates Corbyn though. He is anti-Zionist and likes the more reasonable factions in the middle east. I have defended Corbyn as he is a (commie-) peoples' choice, not a groomed globalist shill, and it's obvious he doesn't get fair coverage in the media.

That doesn't mean I like his views on other things - perhaps a rant is in order about why the standard model of the left in Britain is now fatally outdated and outflanked by globalism.

Trade union fanaticism is so 1970. Feminism has effectively doubled the workforce, skewing the market fatally in favour of the employer. Robots are stealing your jobs (if you strike, we automate) and the other issue crushing the working class is immigration, which the left adores as it will finally snuff out racism once and for all, like in South Africa. Hence the left is irrelevant as it stands, and will only become more so if they cannot adjust.

Oh, and have you ever thought (11:30) maybe Mao did more good than bad? This is the cutting edge of political thought.

https://www.rt.com/uk/387220-local-election-results-tories/

The result of the general election will be a resounding win for the Tories, which I cannot believe I would ever see as a positive. In any case, Theresa is the establishment choice to negotiate Brexit, so that is what will happen. Hopefully the Scots will be canny and wait until Brexit is done before making noises about independence again.

Leave the party early, leave with no regrets

Tuesday, 2 May 2017

Londoners Sign Petition to #FreeKekistan From Soros



Too funny. Check out that youtube channel as well, it's good.



~ Cultural Enrichment from Kekistan ~

The hardships that the Kekistani people have endured certainly have been overlooked for too long. Sadly the Sorosian NGOs have refused to include Kekistanis on their rescue taxis across the Med, due to the racist Coudenhove-Kalergi quota restrictions, which are really a form of apartheid disguised as a humanitarian mission.




Kekophobia must not be tolerated. We must educate the public that Kek is a religion of peace, as Kekistani culture is fragile, and intolerance will only fuel Kekist extremists like Anders Breivik.

Saturday, 29 April 2017

Tuesday, 25 April 2017

UKIP steps up rhetoric: Ban Burka, charge C * Rape Gangs under Hatecrime laws

[RT] UKIP announced plans for a policy of mandatory annual medical checks for schoolgirls in “at-risk minority” groups for Female Genital Mutilation (FGM)* and prosecutions for parents of anyone who has undergone the procedure.

As part of its “integration agenda,” UKIP announced mandatory annual FGM checks for girls in schools. It wants to “implement school-based medical checks on girls at high risk of suffering FGM. These should take place annually and whenever they return from trips overseas.”

The party is also calling for parents of girls who are subjected to FGM, which is illegal in Britain, to face prosecution.

It pledges to “make failure to report instances of FGM by someone who has knowledge that it has taken place a criminal offence itself” and for the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) to “operate under a presumption of prosecution any parents whose daughter has undergone FGM.”

The announcement comes as the party pledged to ban Islamic face coverings in public places in Britain, saying they are a “deliberate barrier to integration and, in many contexts, a security risk too.”

UKIP also wants Sharia law to be banned, and for a legal commission to be created to work to disband Sharia courts. It says Sharia law is “identified as a rival legal system which undermines women’s rights.”

The party has announced that any rape or grooming offense where the perpetrator is a different race should be an “aggravating factor” and treated as a hate crime to ensure longer prison sentences.

UKIP’s education spokesperson, David Kurten, said until there was “better integration” in Britain, “there should be a moratorium on new Islamic schools.” He also called for the immediate closure of schools where there is “evidence of Islamist ideology being taught or imposed on children.”

The proposals still need to be approved by the party’s “policy scrutiny team” and may not make it into UKIP’s official general election manifesto.

https://www.rt.com/uk/385930-ukip-burka-ban-fgm/
Meaning, they want to find out whether it is viable to say these things, be supported by the public, and without the media shrieking excessively.

How many different ways can you ban Islam? They're going for a record - I count five. FGM, madrassas, sharia, honour killings, veils...
...and here's number 6, another ruthless attack on an integral part of their culture
Don't underestimate how corrupted this country is - thousands of kids get groomed by these invaders and the police cover it up because, well, they're used to covering up child abuse amirite? And because racism.

I wasn't going to vote this year but will do so for UKIP if they keep these ideas in their platform. This is a major change in direction for them, and to be honest I thought they were going to fade out of relevance once Brexit is done, but these changes are a major positive.

By the way, my vote will have zero impact thanks to the British voting system and living in a Labour cultland/poverty den. We need proportional representation since we cannot vote separately for the leader of the country like in a Presidential system. The current system is designed to shut out dissent, which isn't necessarily a terrible thing as long as the parties in power aren't trying to do anything crazy, such as genocide by stealth their indigenous population.

Meanwhile, the French can't decide whether they want to be blown up in the streets or not. Look at this, even the gays are turning racist. So much hate.

it's so progressive tho




* of course, I equally support banning the barbaric practice of Male Genital Mutilation.

Let's Play - Berkeley: Total War - PC

"This is the new Berkeley Mod for Rome: Total War."



xD


Monday, 24 April 2017

Solving the Somali Pirate problem...

For a long time I have been saying, why don't they allow cargo ship crews to be armed, in order to defend themselves against these pirates? All it would take is a few trained crew members on each vessel to put a stop to these puny boats. It has puzzled me why private companies have allowed this to go on for so long when it doesn't seem that difficult an issue to solve.


If I was going to be part of one of these crews, I wouldn't go if no one on board was armed or permitted to defend themselves. That's not a tough guy thing to say - "yo lemme at those pirates" - simply, it's far more scary surrendering to them and being at their mercy, than actually fighting them from a far bigger vessel. In my opinion.

Isn't this just a protection racket to enrich proxies of the state?

(I admit this issue appeals to my ancap side. We'll get there one day. Probably not in my lifetime or this century. lol.)



- Clickbait interlude -
I saw this video because it's going around on networks again, it is NOT new as certain clickbait sites are implying. The 'battle' shown above dates back to 2013. I wrote this at first presuming the video was new. Be careful!


Watching this and other footage people are getting on GoPro cameras etc, combined with the privatisation and outsourcing of war makes me think, will war be livestreamed (with a delay of course haha) in the future? Governments would try to censor that, and corporations wouldn't want eyes to be on them also, but could they stop individual contractors from posting Epic Battle Videos that pay a second salary in ad revenue? Because you know everyone would watch. Morbid Fascination.

(sry for going full Black Mirror, but hey it will probably happen)

Thursday, 20 April 2017

Top Hats - Punch A Commie Today! + Antifa killed by Jihadist

Fresno guy killed by white-hating Muslim was an antifa /
Bike Lock Bandit Identified as Professor Eric Clanton of SFSU

"Punch a commie today! Antifas don't deserve any better, as Berkeley has proven once more."
(Video)



(2:00) As a Christian conspiracy theorist, I'm offended by this. Jesus will judge you!!

heh, and here we find a cool new gender identity...lmao

Look bigots, did you ever stop to think this was his way of letting the world know he was a unicorn? You can't help being born as a unicorn. Finally thanks to some dickt tape surgery, he can live his dream, so stfu haters.

Friday, 14 April 2017

Decent article on the shenanigans in Trump's administration

if only it was this simple
nb - the left wing of the establishment are very effective (and dirty) political operators. They identified Flynn, Sessions and Bannon as their targets, and seem on course to get 2 out of 3. As per Vox Day's thinking, this is why the rise of the alt-right is inevitable as it's the only group prepared to retaliate in the sphere of Rules for Radicals politics.

Identity politics can only be countered with identity politics for the same reason that a knife cannot be used in a gunfight.
‘Globalist Gary’ Rising as Bannon Takes Heat

A liberal Democrat who wants to impose a carbon tax on the United States is newly ascendant in the struggle for White House influence after President Trump publicly diminished his chief strategist, Steve Bannon, in a brief Tuesday interview with the New York Post.

Gary Cohn, director of the National Economic Council, is best positioned to rise, if a high-level shake-up were to happen, a source close to several senior White House officials and familiar with the internal jockeying told LifeZette.

Cohn is a still a registered Democrat and a former president of Goldman Sachs. Cohn’s ideology, critics contend, runs counter to the platform that carried Trump to victory in November. Many Trump loyalists are puzzled as to why Trump appears to be eyeing him for a larger role.

Already, Cohn has floated new banking regulations and has invited advocates of a carbon tax to the White House. It’s one reason the source close to several key figures in the White House told LifeZette that Cohn critics refer to him as “globalist Gary.”

Indeed, Cohn’s influence already seems reminiscent of the rise of Dick Darman in the administration of President George H. W. Bush. Darman convinced Bush to abandon his “no new taxes” pledge of the 1988 campaign, leading Bush to defeat in 1992.

But there is another reason for Cohn’s rise beyond the shrinking influence of the populist faction within Trump’s White House: Trump shuffles through people, and right now, Cohn is the new face.

“Trump loves the shiny new object, whether it’s a thing or a person,” tweeted Maggie Haberman, the New York Times reporter who Trump often appears eager to please. “Right now that shiny new object is Cohn.”

Bannon is not on the firing line for an immediate ejection from his post, the source believes, but Trump does appear to be re-establishing his dominance in the White House, signaling to the media that Trump alone sets the agenda. Trump was reportedly upset with media stories — many of them dubious — that Bannon is the puppet master behind the throne.

In truth, Trump is managing several factions. A source close to Bannon said there are three or four factions. One is the populist, anti-globalist wing that Bannon represents. Senior adviser Stephen Miller is also part of this faction, which helped elect Trump as no other faction did.

There's the traditional Republican faction, represented by Reince Priebus, the chief of staff and former Republican National Committee chair. Priebus is seen as having fumbled a number of issues, and is also seen as allowing too much infighting.

"Reince is incompetent, and that invites challenge," the source said.

Then there's the Cohn faction. It includes adviser Dina Powell. The Cohn faction doesn't like Trump's focus on bashing free trade and wants to appease Democrats on the environment.

https://www.lifezette.com/polizette/globalists-eye-takeover-bannon-takes-heat/
I've started following that site, simply because of the editor.

On BBC last night some filthy witch reporter was smirking that Trump's supporters were "stuck with Globalist Trump". lol, a Pyrrhic victory for the deep state...not as though the fundamentals that led people to support Trump, Brexit, Wilders, Le Pen etc have changed. If the Elysium crowd are determined to follow Marie Antoinette's example, then so be it. No reforms, just straight over the cliff. Greedy fools.